Infographic with the SSH logo, displaying the text "0.5% of users represent up to 99.5% of cyber risk exposure" over a background of stacked wooden blocks with icons of people, highlighting the cybersecurity threat with one red icon indicating high risk among black icons.

How to Reverse Privileged Access Management and Identity Management: How to Superusers Need Super Protection

The Hacker NewsZero Trust / Cyber Threat on February 28, 2024

Traditional perimeter-based security has lost money and effectiveness. In consequence, limiting access with firewalls is more important than ensuring communications security between people, systems, and networks. Additionally, just a few superusers, who are typically one in every 200 users, are responsible for the majority of cybersecurity risks. SSH Communications Security, a company that aims to bridge the gap between traditional PAM and IdM solutions and safeguard one out of 200 users, is one of the initiatives.

Your users, both regular users and privileged users, should work together to protect their access and identities through Privileged Access Management ( PAM ) and Identity Management ( IdM ). However, traditional approaches are unsuccessful in doing so.

Privileged Access Management
All identities and basic access are managed by Microsoft Entra. The session lasts longer as targets and data become more critical, and additional protection is required. SSH Communications Security can assist in doing that.

Let’s take a look at what PAM and IDM organizations need to be aware of, as well as how to bridge and future-proof your PAM and IdM.

You need PIM, PAM, and IAM, three of which.

You need all three of them to effectively manage and secure your digital identities, users, and access because Privileged Identity Management ( PIM), Privileged Access Management ( PAM ), and Identity and Access Management ( IAM ) are closely related.

Let’s quickly go over the PIM, PAM, and IAM topics:

Superusers require super protection because not all digital identities are created equal.

Consider this: Your typical user probably requires access to standard office tools like M365 or your CRM. None of your crucial assets need to be accessed by them.

This should be the basis for the identity verification process. Regular users are typically required to be verified using strong authentication methods, such as Microsoft Entra ID, but not always.

Up to 99,5 % of your users are these typical users, or 5 %.

On the other hand, you have your elite high-impact users. Only a select few (typically one in 200 users ) have access to your crucial data, databases, infrastructures, and networks, but they have a lot of power and risks.

Similar considerations should be given to identity verification procedures. You need access controls that transcend traditional strong identity-based authentication for your high-impact users.

Enter the biometric, passwordless, borderless, and keyless future of zero trust.

Traditional approaches cannot bridge your PAM and IdM. They simply ca n’t provide the security you require to safeguard your crucial assets. They also fail to provide effective and future-proof security measures for both high-impact users and your typical users.

Zero Trust, biometric, password-free, keyless, and borderless are the keys to cybersecurity’s future.

Without implicitly trusted users, connections, applications, servers, or devices, you need a future-proof cybersecurity model. Additionally, you require biometric, keyless, and passwordless authentication as an additional layer of security.

From the whitepaper SSH Communications Security provides, learn how important it is to incorporate the password-free and keyless approach into your cybersecurity. Here, you can download the whitepaper.

Found this article interesting? This article is a contributed piece from one of our valued partners. Follow us on Twitter and LinkedIn to read more exclusive content we post.
Skip to content